Like I said before, the issue here isn't about Blu-Rays, or DVDs, or any of that stuff. It's about getting the Super Mario Bros. movie an anamorphic release in any format.
Having said that, Blu-Ray is without a doubt the format it needs to be on. The film is so intricate in its set design, etc. that it
demands a closer look.
Sonicroc wrote:See, I'm rather annoyed at Disney for their current shift to Blu-ray.
Current shift to Blu-Ray? Most all movie studios are doing Blu-Ray now. First and foremost, Disney is a business, and they'll put their products on whatever platforms they deem fit to make them money. Don't think for a second that you choosing not to buy a Disney Blu-Ray is going to make them think twice about ditching the format. They don't care.
Sonicroc wrote:For instance, the DVDs for Up and Toy Story 3 work horribly on my DVD player (chapters repeat, screen goes black indefinitely, etc.). They only work right on other players. I have been buying Pixar DVDs for years. This problem coinkadinkally arose just as they started releasing Blu-rays. This tells me that as Disney moves from DVD to Blu-ray, they are caring less about making sure that they make quality DVDs.
It's not just a Disney issue--as DVDs are the mainstream, they're the cheapest to produce and get out to consumers. Also, as technology changes, discs won't work as well on old players. Be glad that what you have works at all--a lot of early Blu-Ray people were out of luck when new discs wouldn't work on their old systems unless they could hook the system up to the internet for a firmware upgrade--and sometimes, not even then.
Sonicroc wrote:Also, while they used to release Pixar DVD sets loaded with bonus features, that is now only true of the Blu-ray versions.
Bonus features are things that only true fans of the films really care about enough to make it a reason to purchase the film. If you notice--the format that bonus features show up on is whatever the "premium format" of the day is. When there was VHS and Laserdisc, you'd see more/better special features on Laserdisc. When it's VHS/Laserdisc/DVD, you'd see the better features on DVD. Today is no different. You have DVD and Blu-Ray, and the better special features are on Blu-Ray. It's not a coincidence.
Today, DVDs are a cheap sell. When a company like Disney puts out DVDs now, their main markets for them are either parents buying the films for their kids (who normally don't care about special features), or to rental companies. Basically, people that
just want to watch the movie and nothing else.So like I said earlier, the special features are mostly on Blu-Rays now, since it's the format that home theater/film aficionados prefer. They're targeted towards the market that is likely to spend the most money and theoretically be purchasing the films for special features in addition to the film itself.
Yes, that cuts people like you out of the picture that still wants to enjoy their current format like you always have. Talk to any Laserdisc fanatic and he'll be bitter as hell and tell you the same thing.
Sonicroc wrote:I don't want Blu-ray, as a matter of principle. The current idea in the media seems to be that we can't be happy until we have entirely recreated the movie theatre experience in our living rooms. Blu-ray is the first step in that direction, followed by 3D Blu-ray. I enjoy seeing movies in theatres because of the awesome experience, and if it was something everyday, what would be the point?
Perhaps you're right--and to each his own. But speaking for myself, I want the "movie theater experience" for the Super Mario Bros. movie. And that will never happen in the theater again. My only choice is to try to recreate that experience myself.
And this POS, non-anamorphic release does NOT do that. At all.
Sonicroc wrote:Another problem is the cost. Not only does it cost more to buy Blu-ray players and disks, it also costs a lot on the part of potential sellers. In order to put a movie on Blu-ray, it has to undergo an expensive restoration process that smaller companies can't afford. Therefore, this leads to fewer old movies being sold on Blu-ray. (This is something I read about in the newspaper. I don't know how accurately I'm articulating it.)
New technologies always cost more when they're first released. DVD players cost between $600-1000. That was in 1997. It took a few years for them to become the mainstream, didn't it? These home theater aficionados are the people that are early adopters for this stuff and buy the hardware early. Blu-ray will only get cheaper as the years go by. They'll only get cheaper if more people buy them. It's the same thing with video game consoles, etc.
And about the smaller companies--the more this stuff becomes the mainstream the cheaper it becomes to restore/convert movies, etc.
Basically, the more mainstream the format gets, the higher probability is that we'll see Super Mario Bros. on it--when it's not as expensive and risky to produce a high-quality release of the film. Super Mario Bros. was originally released on DVD in 2003--about 6 years after DVDs were introduced.
By the time Super Mario Bros.' 20th anniversary rolls around, it will have been about SEVEN years since Blu-Ray was introduced.
Sonicroc wrote:As long as DVDs are still being sold, I will resist Blu-ray wholeheartedly. While your campaign would likely result in a new DVD release, it would mainly be supporting a Blu-ray release, and you now see that that is not in accordance with my will.
DVDs will be around for a while. And yes, I am mainly supporting a Blu-Ray release. It's the format that has the best shot of getting any kind of additional special features. And like I said, there would likely be a DVD release as well--and probably on demand releases too. Blu-Ray isn't the enemy here--it's things like streaming services like Netflix, iTunes, Xbox Live, etc.
The cheaper it is for people to
just see the movie, the less they'll turn to DVDs--the closest alternative in price. That's why Blu-rays have to have that extra stuff--it's a premium. It's a way for the studios to get you to purchase the film on the format that cost them more to produce it on.
Sonicroc wrote:Besides, while the quality of my SMB DVD isn't perfect by any means, it doesn't seem worth it to buy another one. It's the kind of thing that I would only notice for a few seconds anyway.
Have you seen a Blu-Ray with a proper setup? It's a night and day difference between DVD. And in comparison to the non-anamorphic SMB DVD, it's a ridiculous jump in quality.
Sonicroc wrote:As a fan of the movie, I consider it as good as it could be that it is regularly available on DVD in Target. I sincerely thank you for finding a way to contact the elusive Disney. (I've looked before, trust me.)
That's just it though--it's NOT as good as it could be. Why do you think Disney keeps producing these cheap versions of the SMB DVD? Because it's selling well, and they can sell a cheap version because it's targeted as an impulse purchase for people that are curious or may remember it from their childhood. Once these people learn of a new release with a huge difference, they may be curious to see what all the fuss is about.
Sonicroc wrote:However, I see no reason to push Disney further here. If I do get around to contacting them, it will be to report the problems my Up and TS3 DVDs are having on my DVD player.
We HAVE to push Disney to get them to realize that the film has fans that want a better release. That combined with the good sales of the cheap DVD could get them to think about the possibility.
Sonicroc wrote:By "updated", do you mean it would be a director's cut or something, or are you just talking about film quality?
I mean anything. Barebones minimum needs to be an anamorphic release of some sort--that's film quality.[/quote]
Sonicroc wrote:Anyway, one last thing I feel like I should mention: If Blu-ray entirely replaces DVD, as the official Blu-ray website predicts (whyever would they want us thinking that, eh?

), then of course I would support a Blu-ray release, lest the movie go extinct. (Then again, maybe it would just be transported into a parallel dimension where it would evolve into The Godfather...) However, DVDs are still everywhere. As far as I can tell, you still have the option to get any movie on DVD instead of Blu-ray, even if there are fewer special features. Therefore, it's not dead yet!

Like I said, Blu-Rays won't spell the extinction of DVDs. Streaming services will. If you want to see the future of disc-based media, you should support both DVDs AND Blu-Rays.
Sonicroc wrote:But what are the chances they actually will re-release it with bonus features?
There's a great chance that you'll get not a release at all unless you get the word out there and tell Disney you want one.
Sonicroc wrote:But in both cases, we really need to ask ourselves, would the movie truly be better if a director's cut were to be released? After all, the stuff was cut for a reason. Like, whenever I watch deleted scenes from Pixar films, I'm always like, "That's so stupid! Why the heck would they ever... Oh wait. It's a deleted scene."
I do believe that the film would be better if an extended cut were released. Like Redstar said, most films do have scenes cut for a reason. That comes from two sides--either the director's side or the studio's side. The director cuts the film for him. It's for his vision of what his film should be.
The studio cuts the film for marketing/financial/reception reasons. It's all about money.
In the case of Super Mario Bros., it had a troubled production and there are lots (and lots) of pieces and scenes that aren't in the final cut. But overall, the tone of the film was altered from the original vision of the directors into a fast-paced summer film designed to get you in and out as quick as possible.
Sonicroc wrote:Not that it wouldn't be interesting to see some deleted scenes, but I'm just saying, the Mario movie is probably as good as it can be without rebuilding the sets and taking some new footage.
^No. Read the interviews. Read the scripts. The film could be SO much better with a new cut. While a lot of the deleted scenes wouldn't make the film better, some of them would--namely the "family pride" subplot. One of the chief complaints from critics is that the characters aren't developed well and you don't care about them enough. This deleted subplot would do a lot for that. From what we've seen, it really has the potential to be the entire backbone of the film and the story it's trying to tell.